Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
RAJAN.A – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. correct procedural declaration of probation. (Para 1 , 6 , 8 , 11) |
| 2. university statutes on probation application. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 9) |
| 3. final decision on benefits denied. (Para 10) |
JUDGMENT
2. I have heard Sri.Sri.Rajan.A, the party-in-person as well as Miss.Jaeona James representing Sri.P.C.Sasidharan, the learned Standing Counsel for the 2nd respondent University.
“2. Applicability of the Kerala Service Rules, etc. to the non-teaching staff:- Subject to the provisions of the Act and the Statutes issued thereunder, the Kerala State and Subordinate Service Rules, 1958, the Kerala Service Rules, 1959 and the Government Servants Conduct Rules, 1960 as amended from time to time in so far as may be applicable and except to the extent expressly provided for in these Statutes, shall apply in the matter of all the service conditions of the University employees in the University service:
5. Per contra, it is the submission of Miss.Jaeona, the learned counsel for the University that the provisions of Chapter 4 can be made applicable only in a situation where there are no other provisions in the University Act or the Statues, which goes against the spirit of the provisio
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
