Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
ARATTUPUZHA MANDARAM KADAVU SIVARATHRI AGHOSHA SAMITHI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition challenges bye-laws on traditional rights. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. hearing requests emphasized in judicial review. (Para 4) |
| 3. director's role affirmed in considering grievances. (Para 5 , 6) |
JUDGMENT
The above writ petition is filed with the following prayers:
“a) Call for the records leading to the issuance of Exhibit P12 and quash Exhibit P12 by issue of a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate, writ, order or direction.
b) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the 1st respondent to re-consider Exhibit P9 petition in accordance with the mandate of Section 191 of the Kerala Panchayat Raj Act , 1994 and take a decision thereon in accordance with law, after affording the petitioner an opportunity of being heard, within a time limit to be stipulated by this Hon’ble Court.
c) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction commanding the respondents 4 to 6 to keep in abeyance all further proceedings pursuant to decision No. 12(1) dated 04.03.2024 of the 6th respondent till such time a final decision is taken by the 1st respondent on Exhibit P9 petition in accordance with law.
d) Dispense
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
