IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
PRASANTH .T.J – Appellant
Versus
THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners sought police protection for laying tiles. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. respondents disputed ownership and right of way. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court upheld petitioners' right of way for convenience. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. reasonable use of pathway includes maintenance. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 5. court directed police to maintain law and order. (Para 12) |
JUDGMENT
Petitioners are owners of separate properties situated in Survey Nos.855/4, 855/5 of Thrikkakara Village, and have constructed independent residential houses. The properties owned by the petitioners, initially belonged to the father of the 4th respondent. Those properties devolved upon the 4th respondent, her siblings and her mother. The predecessors in title of the petitioners had purchased their properties from the brother of the 4th respondent as per different title deeds. Later, petitioners purchased their properties as per Ext.P1 to Ext.P16 title deeds. The access to their property is through a way provided to them and specified in the title deeds itself.
2. The petitioners allege that they had laid interlocking tiles through the 29 metre portion of the way to their individual houses, but for the 30 metre portion of the pathw

Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.