Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
K. NATARAJAN, JOHNSON JOHN, JJ
UNION OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
MARIYAM P.T – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge against the tribunal's order regarding family pension due to conflicting marital claims. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. submission of the parties involved and their respective legal representations. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. dispute regarding legal heirs and their documentation for pension sanction. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. arguments presented by petitioners and respondents concerning validity and evidence. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. court's observations on the significance of proper marital documentation. (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 6. criteria for upholding or overturning the tribunal's order based on legal requirements. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
COMMON JUDGMENT
Writ petition W.P(C) No. 44757 of 2025 is filed by the petitioners challenging the order passed by the Armed Forces Tribunal, Regional Bench, Kochi (hereinafter referred to as “the Tribunal”), for setting aside the order passed in O.A. No. 458 of 2018 dated 17.11.2022.
3. We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners in W.P (C) No. 44757 of 2025, the learned Central Government Counsel appearing for respondents 2 to 5 and learned counsel appearing for the first respondent. In WP(C) No.40337 of 2025,
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
