SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 7460

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
N. NAGARESH, J
BEENA V. – Appellant
Versus
GOVERNMENT OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.K.K.AKHIL
For the Respondents: SRI.V.VENUGOPAL, GOVERNMENT PLEADER

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 29th day of January, 2026 The writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking to direct the respondents to sponsor the petitioner for employment based on her technical qualification of Typewriting Lower and Higher against any of the vacancies existing, irrespective of the fact that she has crossed the age of 50.

2. The petitioner states that she had registered her name with the Employment Exchange in 1991. She has not been sponsored for any employment. In the year 2020, the petitioner was called for an interview for appointment as part-time Sweeper, but she was not selected presumably due to the fact that she was overaged.

As the petitioner is overaged by now, the petitioner cannot maintain a writ petition seeking to sponsor her for employment. The writ petition is hence dismissed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top