SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 7498

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
SUNITHA SUNILKUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.C.C.ANOOP
For the Respondents: SRI.M.C. ASHI

ORDER

This application is filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, BNSS ), seeking pre-arrest bail.

2. The applicant is the sole accused in Crime No.50/2025 of Cyber Crime Police Station, Palakkad District. The offences alleged are punishable under Section s 316 (2) and 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita ( BNS ), 2023 and Section 66D of the Information Technology Act, 2000 .

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that the applicant, with the intention to cheat the de facto complainant and to fraudulently obtain money, contacted him through social media by falsely promising that he could earn huge profits through online trading. Believing such representations, the de facto complainant, during the period from 08.07.2025 to 02.09.2025, transferred a total amount of ₹42,35,925/- (Rupees Forty Two Lakh Thirty Five Thousand Nine Hundred and Twenty Five only), in several instalments, to various bank accounts as directed by the applicant. Thereafter, the applicant neither paid the promised profits nor returned the amounts so transferred, thereby cheating the de facto complainant.

4. I have heard Sri. C.C. Anoop, the learned counsel for the ap

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top