Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
N.NAGARESH, J
DR. SHAMNAD. J. – Appellant
Versus
THE ADMINISTRATOR IQBAL COLLEGE TRUST – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner challenges the authority of the administrator regarding the disciplinary proceedings. (Para 2 , 4 , 10) |
| 2. contentions regarding the appointment of administrator and authority to discipline. (Para 5 , 11) |
| 3. court's examination of statutory compliance and validity of disciplinary measures. (Para 8 , 9 , 13) |
J U D G M E N T
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
The petitioner, who is working as Assistant Professor in Botany in the Iqbal College, Peringamala, seeks to declare that the 1st respondent-Administrator is not entitled to continue any disciplinary proceedings against the petitioner after 28.07.2024 in view of Ext.P4 and hence Exts.P6 and P10 are illegal.
2. The petitioner states that he was appointed in the College on 18.06.2020. The petitioner detected malpractices in examination by three students. When enquiry was started against the students, certain staff members turned against the petitioner. The petitioner was suspended as per Ext.P1 order dated 20.02.2024. A Teacher cannot be kept under suspension by the educational agency except when disciplinary proceedings are initiated in view of Section 60 (2) of the Kerala University Act . No disciplinary proceedings wer
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
