IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, SYAM KUMAR V.M., JJ
UNION BANK OF INDIA,REGIONAL OFFICE KOZHIKKODE REP. BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER – Appellant
Versus
SREEKUMAR V D – Respondent
ORDER Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari, J.
The present Review Petition is filed under Order XLVII Rule 1 read with Section 114 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking review of the judgment dated 7th July 2025 passed in W.A.No.1822 of 2018 whereby the Writ Appeal was dismissed.
2. The brief facts of the case are that the respondent/writ petitioner was appointed as Assistant Manager in the Union Bank of India vide Ext.P1 order dated 19.09.2011. As per the terms of the appointment, the respondent was required to execute a service indemnity bond undertaking to serve the bank for a minimum period of three years or else a sum of Rs.2.5 lakhs shall be required to be paid to the bank in case he resigned from the service of the bank before completing the stipulated minimum service period of three years. Accordingly, the respondent executed Ext.P2 indemnity bond. While working as Assistant Manager with Union Bank of India, the respondent got selected in the Corporation Bank as Probationary Manager. The respondent remitted Rs.2.5 lakh and was relieved to join the Corporation Bank. Subsequently, he filed Ext.P5 representation before the Regional Manager, Union Bank of India requesting him to refu
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.