SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 7531

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
T.R. RAVI, J
AGHIL SHIPPING AGENCIES – Appellant
Versus
THE ESTATE OFFICER – Respondent
OP(C) NO. 344 OF 2026 | CMA NO.16 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.S.K.ADHITHYAN, SMT.SHAHINA NOUSHAD, SHRI.KRISHNA S. KARUNAKARAN, SHRI.JAI PRAKASH CHOUDHARY

Petitioners have a right to withdraw petitions with court permission.

Headnote:The court analyzed the petition filed by the appellant under OP

(C) No. 344 of 2026. The petitioner requested withdrawal of the original petition with permission to file a fresh one. The court granted this request, leading to dismissal of the original petition as withdrawn. The court defined the key issues as the petitioner's right to withdraw and reopen the matter. The principle established relates to the right of petitioners to withdraw petitions at their discretion, with the court’s permission. Consequently, the original petition was dismissed as withdrawn.

JUDGMENT

The counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the original petition with liberty to file a fresh original petition.

Permission granted and the original petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

T.R. RAVI JUDGE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top