Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
ATHUL KANTH P.C – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the nature of the charges against the applicant highlights serious allegations of forgery. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding the innocence of the accused and the prosecution's stance were presented. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. examination of the need for custodial interrogation and considerations for denying bail. (Para 6 , 7) |
O R D E R
This application is filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, BNSS ), seeking pre-arrest bail.
2. The applicant is the accused No.14 in Crime No.1434/2025 of Ponnani Police Station, Malappuram District. The offences alleged are punishable under Sections 112 (1), 335, 336(1), 336(2), 337, 339 and 340(2) r/w Section 3(5)
of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhitha, 2023 .
3. The prosecution case, in short, is that the accused persons in furtherance of their common intention to commit the offence, created forged certificates and mark lists of various courses of various universities and educational institutions from 2018 onwards and sold them to the persons for huge amounts in order to get employment in India and abroad and thereby committed the offences.
4. I have heard Sri.Ravi Krishnan, the learned counsel for th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
