IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
P.C. RAJAPPAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the petitioners request to quash the forfeiture of bond. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. the court hears arguments from both sides. (Para 3) |
| 3. conditions for bond forfeiture and the court's decision. (Para 4 , 5) |
O R D E R Dated this the 5th day of February,2026 The petitioners are the sureties in M.C.No.117/2024 on the file of the Court of the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Thiruvalla, which was initiated against the 4th respondent in the above case, who is none other than the son of the petitioners.
2. The petitioners have stated in the Criminal Miscellaneous Case that, the 4th respondent is an accused in several cases. Based on the report of the Pulikeezhu Police Station, the Sub-Divisional Magistrate had passed a preliminary order under Section 129 r/w Section 130 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 ( BNSS ), directing the 4th respondent to execute a bond with two sureties in order to maintain good behaviour. Notwithstanding the undertaking made by the petitioners and the 4th respondent, the 4th respondent got involved in a subsequent crime. Consequently, the 2nd respondent forfeited the bond and directed the petitioners to pay Rs.25,000/- each within one month as pe
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.