Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
NISARUDEEN.A. – Appellant
Versus
ARUVIKKARA GRAMA PANCHAYAT – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. lack of appearance leads to dismissal. (Para 1 , 2) |
JUDGMENT
When the matter came up for consideration on 09.01.2026, there was no appearance for the petitioner and when the matter was taken up for consideration today also, there is no appearance for the petitioner.
2. Further, a statement has been filed by the 3rd respondent, against whom the allegations are made, wherein it is stated that the property has been transferred to a third party. The details of the same have also been stated therein.
Since there is no appearance for the petitioner for two postings, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/-
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
