IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
HELEN JOY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 26278 OF 2021
JUDGMENT
Petitioner has approached this Court aggrieved by Ext.P4 order issued by the 3rd respondent, wherein the request made by the petitioner for effecting mutation has been declined.
As per the Transfer of Registry Rules, a decision on the application for effecting mutation is to be taken by the Tahsildar (Land Records), but in this case the decision has been taken by the 3rd respondent Village Officer, who has no authority to do so. Therefore, Ext.P4 order is set aside with a consequential direction to the Tahsildar (Land Records) concerned to finalise the proceedings on the request made by the petitioner for effecting mutation of the property based on Ext.P3 deed, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as well as the additional 4th respondent. A decision in this regard shall be taken within an outer limit of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment.
Writ petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.