IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN, J
P.DEVAKI AMMA – Appellant
Versus
SIVADASAN – Respondent
RFA NO. 484 OF 2004
JUDGMENT
It is submitted by the counsel on both sides that the matter is settled between the parties out of court and the entire amount covered by the decree has been paid at the execution stage itself.
2. Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo dated 29.01.2026 producing the order in E.A.No.84/2005 in E.P.No.30/2004 in O.S.No.209/1996 on the files of the Sub Court, Nedumangad.
3. In the light of the memo, this appeal is disposed of.
Since the matter has been settled out of court, the appellant is entitled for refund of the court fee paid in terms of the decision in High Court of Judicature at Madras, rep. by its Registrar General v. M.C.Subramaniam and Others [2021 (2) KHC 62] . The Registry may refund the same on usual terms.
Sd/-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.