SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 7780

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BASANT BALAJI, J
MINIKUMARI K.P., SIVAN PILLAI – Appellant
Versus
HDFC BANK LIMITED – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 3678 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.VIJITH P. VIJAYAN
For the Respondents: SMT. S. AMBILY, SC

The court provided a structured repayment plan for overdue loan amounts under the SARFAESI Act, asserting the right of the Bank to secure assets upon failure of payment.

Headnote:This Writ Petition examines housing loan agreements made under the SARFAESI Act, where due repayments were sought. The court authorized a repayment plan after recognizing the overdue amount of Rs.4,84,377. The central issue was whether the petitioner could structure payments in installments, leading to the ruling that allowed a lump-sum and subsequent regular payments, alongside the right of the Bank to reclaim secured assets upon default.

Table of Content
1. loan default and subsequent notice under sarfaesi. (Para 1 , 2)
2. court recognized the need for a structured repayment arrangement. (Para 3)
3. the court issued directives for repayment and consequences of non-compliance. (Para 4)

JUDGMENT

(Dated this the 31st day of January, 2025)

The petitioners had availed housing loan of Rs.24,00,000/-

from the respondent bank in the year 2018, 2019 and in 2023, by mortgaging 7.89 Ares of property comprised in Re Survey No. 399/3,Old Sy.4642 of Thazhava Village ,Karunagapally Taluk ,Kollam District. When there was default in the repayment the bank initiated SARFAESI proceedings against the petitioners and issued notice under Section 13(2) of Act.

2. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents, on instructions, submits that as on today, the total overdue amount in two loans comes to Rs.4,84,377/-(Rupees four lakhs eighty four thousand three hundred seventy seven only).

3. The counsel for the petitioner seeks an indulgence from this court to grant installments to wipe off the overdue amount. The respondent Bank is willing to accept repayment of overdue amount in limited installments. This is recorded.

4. Having heard the counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the Standing counsel appearing for the respondent bank, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with the following directions:

(i) The petitioner shall pay a lump sum amount of Rs.50,000/-(Rupees fifty thousand only) on or before

28.02.2026.

(ii) The petitioner shall pay the balance overdue amount along with any accrued interest, cost and allied charges, in 10 equal monthly installments, along with regular installments.

(iii) The first installment is to be paid on or before 28.03.2026, and the remaining installments on or before the 28th day of every succeeding months, along with regular installments.

(iv) After making payment of the entire overdue amount along with regular installments, the petitioner shall continue to pay the regular installments till the entire loan liability is discharged.

(v) In case of failure to make payment of any of the installments or the lump sum amount as directed above, the Bank shall be free to take possession of the secured assets, in accordance with law.

(vi) Till such time, all coercive proceedings against the secured assets shall be deferred.

Sd/-

BASANT BALAJI, JUDGE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top