SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 7789

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C. JAYACHANDRAN, J
MATHEW KURUVILLA – Appellant
Versus
TAHSILDAR (LAND RECORDS) – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.T.K.RAJESHKUMAR, SHRI.MANOJ V GEORGE, SMT.T.N.BINDU, SHRI.JIJO JOSE
For the Respondents: AJITH VISWANATHAN (GP)

JUDGMENT

Ext.P1 is an application preferred by the petitioner seeking transfer of registry, as also, for subdivision of the petitioner’s property having an extent of 236 cents in various survey numbers, as detailed in the writ petition and the same is pending before the respondent Tahasildar. The petitioner seeks a direction to dispose of Ext.P1 within a time frame.

2. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader, this Court directs the respondent to consider and pass orders in Ext.P1 application, in accordance with law, expeditiously, at any rate, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment before the respondent, for compliance. Needless to say that the petitioner shall fully co-operate with the respondent, in case any measurement of the property is required, which direction is given taking into account of the fact that the extent involved is substantial to the effect of 236 cents.

The writ petition stands disposed of, as above.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top