Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 7793

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C. PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
..... – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 3672 OF 2021

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.RAMESH P.
For the Respondents: SMT. C.SEENA

Acquittal by trial court rendered the Crl.M.C. infructuous.

Headnote:The Court analyzed the circumstances surrounding Crl.M.C. No. 3672 of 2021, noting that an acquittal by the trial court rendered the petition infructuous. The primary issue was whether to allow the petition following the acquittal. Hence, the court dismissed the petition as infructuous.

O R D E R

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, in this case, the petitioner has already been acquitted by the trial court and as such this Crl.M.C. has become infructuous.

Accordingly, this Crl.M.C. is dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 7793

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMC. PRATHEEP KUMAR, J..... – AppellantVersusSTATE OF KERALA – RespondentCRL.MC NO. 3672 OF 2021

Acquittal by trial court rendered the Crl.M.C. infructuous.

Headnote:The Court analyzed the circumstances surrounding Crl.M.C. No. 3672 of 2021, noting that an acquittal by the trial court rendered the petition infructuous. The primary issue was whether to allow the petition following the acquittal. Hence, the court dismissed the petition as infructuous.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C. PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
..... – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 3672 OF 2021