SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 7794

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C. PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
SIBI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.T.MADHU, SMT.C.R.SARADAMANI, SRI.K.B.RAJESH, SRI.SHAHID AZEEZ, SRI.RENJISH S. MENON
For the Respondents: SMT. C.SEENA

O R D E R

The learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Public Prosecutor submitted that, in this case, the petitioner has already been convicted by the trial court and therefore, the Crl.M.C. has become infructuous.

In the result, the Crl.M.C. is dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top