IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN, M.B. SNEHALATHA, JJ
JOHNS J MANGATTU – Appellant
Versus
DR. ASHA BABU – Respondent
Devan Ramachandran, J.
It is conceded at the bar by the learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri. Leo George, that the issues in this case have already been adverted to and answered by this bench in the judgment in OP(FC)No.495 of 2025. He was, therefore, gracious enough to add that his client will be satisfied if the directions in the said judgment are made specifically applicable to this case also.
2. We have no doubt that in the judgment in OP(FC)No.495 of 2025, we had even taken note of the fact of the petitioner having filed a fresh Original Petition – namely this one - before us. However, this Original Petition, was not listed before us only on account of technical reasons, which have now been cured.
In the above circumstances, we dispose of this Original Petition in terms of our observations, holdings, findings, and directions in the judgment in OP(FC)No.495 of 2025 dated 19th September 2025.
Sd/-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.