Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
SAHAL MANAKAL HANIS – Appellant
Versus
NATIONAL MEDICAL COMMISSION – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's application for registration based on completed medical education. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. counsel representation in the court proceedings. (Para 3) |
| 3. judgment on the necessity of clinical clerkship for registration. (Para 4) |
| 4. final decision: no relief granted; petition dismissed. (Para 5) |
JUDGMENT
Petitioner seeks for a direction to process his registration application by the second respondent. A further relief is also sought to declare that clerkship [clinical clerkship] is not required as per Ext.P21, since the petitioner had compensated for online classes with physical classes in the parent institution as directed by the first respondent.
2. Petitioner claims to be a foreign medical graduate who completed his medical course from Ukraine. According to the petitioner, he obtained his eligibility certificate and thereafter completed the course from Ukraine, which is equivalent to MBBS in India. After having undergone physical classes in the parent institution, including compensatory physical classes for the online classes undergone due to Covid-19 and obtained a graduation certificate. Subsequently, in order to carry out the Compulsory Rotating Medical Intern
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
