Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K. NARENDRAN, MURALEE KRISHNA S., JJ
CHOLAMANDALAM INVESTMENT AND FINANCE CO. LTD – Appellant
Versus
JASMIN S – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of appellant and respondent, loan details (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. interim orders and loan repayment issues (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. maintainability of appeal under kerala act (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. final decision overview (Para 22) |
| 5. duties in writ jurisdiction and material fact disclosure (Para 25 , 26 , 27) |
JUDGMENT
The respondent in W.P.(C)No.46954 of 2025, which is a Non-Banking Financial Company (NBFC), has filed this writ appeal invoking the provisions under Section 5 (i) of the Kerala High Court Act, 1958 , challenging the interim order dated 22.01.2026 of the learned Single Judge in that writ petition, which was one filed by the respondent herein-petitioner, invoking the writ jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following reliefs;
(ii) Issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ or order directing the respondent to allow the petitioner to pay the arrears of loan amounts in 20 equal monthly installments and to keep all further proceedings pursuant to Exhibit P1 in abeyance till then;
2. The document marked as Ext.P1 is a notice dated 15.10.2025 issued by the Advocate Commissioner appointed by the Chief Judi
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
