Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN, J
TRICY P.T. @ TRICY DINU – Appellant
Versus
NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduces the review petition's challenge to a previous judgment. (Para 1) |
| 2. arguments presented by the appellants regarding flaws in the judgment. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. the respondent's lack of counter affidavit and position on errors. (Para 4) |
| 4. court reiterates the purpose and limitations of review petitions. (Para 5) |
O R D E R
This review petition is filed by the appellants in MACA No.179 of 2025, who were the claimants in O.P.(MV) No.1084 of 2018 before the Additional District & Sessions Judge-VIII & Additional Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-IV, Ernakulam, seeking review of the judgment dated 23.07.2025 rendered by this Court in MACA No.179 of 2025. The appeal was dismissed on the ground that there was a delay of 933 days in filing the appeal, and the application for condonation of delay was also dismissed.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the review petitioners and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent.
3. Learned counsel for the review petitioners submitted that the judgment rendered in the appeal is liable to be reviewed, as it suffers from serious material flaws and errors apparent on the face of the record. It is further submitted that the power of r
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
