SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 8102

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BASANT BALAJI, J
PREETHA V R. – Appellant
Versus
STATE BANK OF INDIA – Respondent
OP (DRT) NO. 41 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SMT.M.A.SULFIA, SRI.ABDUL JALEEL
For the Respondents: SMT. S. LAKSHMY

The withdrawal of a sale notice nullifies the basis for an original petition, leading to its closure.

Headnote:The petitioner's application was addressed regarding the sale notice issued under Section 13(4) of the SARFAESI Act. The respondent's counsel indicated withdrawal of the auction notice, which resolved the petitioner's grounds for appeal. The Court found no basis for continuation, thus concluded the petition. The central issue was whether the original petition held merit post-withdrawal of the sale notice. The Court reasoned that once the basis for the petition was nullified by the retraction of the notice, the petition could not stand. Consequently, the court closed the original petition as the grounds were no longer applicable.

JUDGMENT

(Dated this the 27th day of January, 2026)

The learned counsel for the respondent, on instructions, submits that Ext.P5 sale notice dated 22.12.2025, issued for the sale of the property scheduled on 28.01.2026 has already been withdrawn. In such circumstances, there is no ground for the petitioner to pursue this original petition and the same is accordingly closed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top