SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 8111

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
S.MANU, J
SUSMITH – Appellant
Versus
SUMAN@ SUMAM – Respondent
RP NO. 397 OF 2024(FILING NO) | RSA NO.579 OF 2010



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.M.KIRANLAL, SRI.MANU RAMACHANDRAN, SRI.R.RAJESH (VARKALA), SHRI.SAMEER M NAIR, SHRI.GEETHU KRISHNAN, SMT.SAILAKSHMI MENON
For the Respondents: SHRI.SABIKH MOHAMMED V.S

A petitioner may withdraw a review petition and pursue other legal remedies before appropriate forums.

Headnote:The petitioner sought permission to withdraw the review petition, which was filed against the judgment dated 29.08.2019. The court observed that the petitioner is free to pursue other remedies before a competent forum. The review petition was dismissed as withdrawn.

ORDER

The learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw this review petition with liberty to avail other remedies.

Hence, this Review Petition is dismissed as withdrawn leaving it open to the review petitioner to pursue appropriate remedies before competent forum.

Sd/-

S.MANU JUDGE SLR

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

App_Store_Badge Google_Play_Store

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon Instagram Icon Twitter Icon

Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

whatsapp-icon