SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 8140

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
SHERNA T RASHEED – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
BAIL APPL. NO. 570 OF 2026 | CRIME NO.604/2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.NAVANEETH.N.NATH, SMT.ABHIRAMI S., SHRI.ABDUL LATHEEF P.M., SMT.KRUPA SAJI
For the Respondents: SMT.SREEJA V., SR. PP

Transit bail can be sought when apprehending inter-state arrest and reasonable grounds are presented.

Headnote:This application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeks transit bail for the accused in Crime No.604/2025. The court finds the applicant's apprehension of inter-state arrest valid, allowing the applicant to seek appropriate remedies from the jurisdictional court within three weeks. Therefore, the applicant shall not be arrested until the specified period ends.

Table of Content
1. application for transit bail filed. (Para 1 , 2)
2. applicant's apprehension of arrest. (Para 3)
3. court hears arguments for and against bail. (Para 4)
4. court recognizes the validity of transit bail. (Para 5 , 6)
5. final decision to allow time for seeking remedies. (Para 7)

O R D E R

This is an application filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita ( BNSS ), 2023.

2. The applicant is the accused in Crime No.604/2025 of Cyber Crime Police Station, North-East Division, Yelahanka, Bangalore City. The offences alleged against the applicant are punishable under Section 66D of the Information Technology Act , 2000 in conjunction with Sections 318 (4) and 319(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita , 2023.

3. The applicant apprehends arrest in the above crime.

4. Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and the learned Senior Public Prosecutor.

5. The Supreme Court in Priya Indoria v. State of Karnataka (2023 KHC OnLine 6997) held that though this Court is not in a position to grant pre-arrest bail in cases where crimes have been registered outside the territorial jurisdiction, this Court is empowered to pass an order of transit bail.

6. The apprehension of the applicant of an inter-state arrest appears to be well-founded. The grounds raised by the applicant for an order of transit bail appears to be reasonable to avoid minimum threat to his life and personal liberty in the jurisdiction where the FIR is registered.

7. The applicant has satisfied this Court regarding his inability to seek anticipatory bail from the court which has territorial jurisdiction to take cognizance of the offence immediately.

This bail application is therefore disposed of with liberty to the applicant to approach the jurisdictional Court and seek proper remedies in accordance with law, within a period of three weeks from today. The applicant shall not be arrested till the expiry of the said three weeks.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top