Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
SHERNA T RASHEED – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for transit bail filed. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. applicant's apprehension of arrest. (Para 3) |
| 3. court hears arguments for and against bail. (Para 4) |
| 4. court recognizes the validity of transit bail. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 5. final decision to allow time for seeking remedies. (Para 7) |
O R D E R
This is an application filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita ( BNSS ), 2023.
2. The applicant is the accused in Crime No.604/2025 of Cyber Crime Police Station, North-East Division, Yelahanka, Bangalore City. The offences alleged against the applicant are punishable under Section 66D of the Information Technology Act , 2000 in conjunction with Sections 318 (4) and 319(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita , 2023.
3. The applicant apprehends arrest in the above crime.
4. Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and the learned Senior Public Prosecutor.
5. The Supreme Court in Priya Indoria v. State of Karnataka (2023 KHC OnLine 6997) held that though this Court is not in a position to grant pre-arrest bail in cases where crimes have been registered outside the territorial jurisdiction, this Court is empowered to pass an order of transit bail.
6. The apprehens
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
