SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 8162

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN, M.B. SNEHALATHA, JJ
JINSA C.H – Appellant
Versus
RAFEEK K.A – Respondent
OP (FC) NO. 93 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.VARGHESE K.PAUL, SMT.SNEHA DIVAKARAN P., SHRI.SAFEER BAWA A.S., SMT.ANAMIKA SASIKUMAR, SMT.JULLY SIJU, SMT.SHEBA LIZ ULLAS, SRI.VINEED ABRAHAM, SMT.BINDHU ANTONY, SRI.ANITH JAMES

The court held that the dismissal of an Original Petition does not restrict the parties from seeking other legal remedies.

Headnote:The legal proceedings relate to OP (FC) NO. 93 OF 2026 concerning the dismissal of reliefs in light of a previous judgment in O.P.No.184/2025. The Court provided the petitioner an opportunity to pursue other remedies available under the law. The primary issue was whether the dismissal would infringe upon the rights of the parties, with the Court affirming that it does not. The final outcome was the dismissal of the Original Petition.

Devan Ramachandran, J.

When this matter was called today, the learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that no reliefs are being pressed for by his client in this Original Petition, since pending this matter, the judgment has been delivered by the learned Family Court in O.P.No.184/2025. He, however, sought liberty for his client to invoke other remedies as are available in law.

In the afore circumstances, this Original Petition is dismissed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top