SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 8164

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
G. GIRISH, J
RENJITH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Sri. Arun Babu, Sri. N. Muhammed Nahas
For the Respondents: Sri Sudheer.G

O R D E R

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that this Crl.M.C. need not be continued, since the petitioner had already been acquitted by the Trial Court.

Recording the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Crl.M.C. stands closed.

(Sd/-)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top