Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
RASHAD MUHAMMED – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. arrest reasons and compliance are crucial in determining bail eligibility. (Para 2 , 6) |
| 2. judicial commentary on the legality and processes surrounding arrest. (Para 4 , 7 , 9 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 3. constitutional requirements for informing grounds of arrest are detailed. (Para 5 , 10) |
O R D E R
This application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 (for short, BNSS ), seeking regular bail.
2. The applicant is the accused No.3 in Crime No.1131/2025 of Kondotty Police Station, Malappuram District. The offences alleged are punishable under Sections 22 (c) and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act , 1985.
3. The prosecution case, in short, is that on 05.10.2025, the accused Nos.1 to 7 were found in possession of 152.64 grams of MDMA along with 0.65 grams of Ecstasy, kept in 2 cars bearing Reg. Nos. KL-84-C7458 & KL-84-D-3342 respectively, with the intention of sale, and thereby committed the offences.
4. I have heard Sri.Akshay Joy, the learned counsel for the applicant and Sri.M.C.Ashi, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.
5. The learned counsel appearing for the applicant submitted that th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
