Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 8271

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
N.NAGARESH, J
MADHAV T.K. – Appellant
Versus
SMT. DR. K. VASUKI IAS – Respondent
CON.CASE(C) NO. 3096 OF 2025 | W.P.(C) NO.8110 OF 2025

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED, SRI.M.SAJJAD
For the Respondents: SRI.V VENUGOPAL

The court clarifies that further grievances must be addressed through new proceedings post-compliance with earlier judgments.

Headnote:The Court considered the proceedings related to the Contempt of Court Case arising from the judgment dated 04.03.2025 in W.P.

(C) No.8110/2025. It was noted that orders had been passed subsequently, allowing for further grievances to be addressed by the petitioner. The Court ultimately closed the Contempt of Court Case while granting liberty to the petitioner to challenge any new orders, if necessary.

Table of Content
1. orders passed as per earlier judgments. (Para 1)
2. case closed with liberty to challenge. (Para 2)

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 6^th day of February, 2026 Government Pleader submits that orders have been passed pursuant to the directions contained in the judgment dated 04.03.2025 in W.P.(C) No.8110/2025.

2. In that view of the matter, if the petitioner has any further subsisting grievance, the petitioner has to challenge the order now passed.

Granting liberty to do so, the Contempt of Court Case is closed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 8271

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMN.NAGARESH, JMADHAV T.K. – AppellantVersusSMT. DR. K. VASUKI IAS – RespondentCON.CASE(C) NO. 3096 OF 2025 | W.P.(C) NO.8110 OF 2025

The court clarifies that further grievances must be addressed through new proceedings post-compliance with earlier judgments.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
N.NAGARESH, J
MADHAV T.K. – Appellant
Versus
SMT. DR. K. VASUKI IAS – Respondent
CON.CASE(C) NO. 3096 OF 2025 | W.P.(C) NO.8110 OF 2025