Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
KARUVANNUR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD NO 112 – Appellant
Versus
DEPUTY DIRECTOR DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT GOVT. OF INDIA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. counsel submits order not served, seeks withdrawal. (Para 1) |
| 2. court permits withdrawal, dismisses petition. (Para 2) |
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that a copy of the order dated 27.01.2026 has not been served by him on respondents 2 and 3. He, however, submitted that a certified copy of the order directed to be served on the petitioner has already been received.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition.
Permission is granted. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/-
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
