Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
ABRAHAM.T.A. – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. ownership and use of property in local jurisdiction. (Para 2) |
| 2. necessity of hearing in local administrative processes. (Para 3) |
| 3. judicial oversight in administrative decisions. (Para 4) |
JUDGMENT
This Writ Petition (C) is filed seeking the following reliefs:
" 1. Issue a writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, calling for the records leading to Ext.P6 and quash the same as illegal.
2. Issue a writ by way of declaration, declaring that the respondent panchayath have absolutely no right to issue Ext.P6 notice as the stream in question which is the subject of the notice is not vested nor the same was included in the asset register of the panchayath.
3. Issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the respondents 2 and 3 to restore the property of the petitioner to its original position as on the date of the notice Ext.P6."
[SIC]
2. The petitioner is the absolute owner of an extent of 27.47 Ares in Re.Sy No.158/1/1 of Vazhoor Village is the submission. The petitioner purchased the above property is the submission. The total extent of land as aforesaid has two segments, and the Kottayam-Kumily road is o
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
