SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 8445

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
N.NAGARESH, J
ROSHINI SURESH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 1625 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.K.MOHANAKANNAN, SRI.H.PRAVEEN (KOTTARAKARA)
For the Respondents: SMT.V.A. HARITHA, GOVERNMENT PLEADER

Approval of appointment and timely payment of salary are essential rights of approved teachers under education statutes.

Headnote:The petitioners, approved teachers in a high school, sought a direction for the release of pending salary arrears after a notice indicated delays due to pending audits. The court found the reasoning for withholding salary incorrect and ordered expedient payment. The central issues revolved around the lawful entitlement to salary and the procedural obligations of the educational authorities. The court affirmed the petitioners' right to receive their due salaries promptly.

Table of Content
1. petitioners entitled to salary arrears. (Para 1 , 2)
2. court directs timely release of salary arrears. (Para 3)

JUDGMENT Dated this the 3rd day of February, 2026 The petitioners are approved Teachers working in the

5th respondent’s School with effect from 15.07.2021. Exts.P2 to P4 are the approval orders which grant approval from the date of appointment. Salary is being paid from the date of approval and the arrears are kept pending. Ext.P5 is the bill.

2. By Ext.P6, it is informed that granting of approval from the date of appointment is accepted and since auditing is pending before the Deputy Director of Education, salary cannot be paid. The reasoning is palpably wrong. Seeking for a direction to release the arrears of salary, the petitioners have filed this writ petition.

3. When this writ petition came up for hearing, Government Pleader, on instructions, submitted that the respondents have dropped the objections. In that view of the matter, the 4th respondent is compellable to release the arrears of salary due to the petitioners as evident from Ext.P5, expeditiously.

The writ petition is accordingly disposed of directing the 4th respondent to release the amount admissible to the petitioners, as expeditiously as possible and at any rate, within a period of two months.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top