SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 8466

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
A. Badharudeen, J
Shemitha – Appellant
Versus
Abdul Naseer – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Shri Deepak Joy.K.
For the Respondents: Anima.M., Public Prosecutor

JUDGMENT

Dated, this the 02nd day of February, 2026 This appeal has been filed challenging the order dated 01.11.2019 in S.T. No. 1294 of 2019 of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Chalakudy, as extracted hereunder:-

“This case is registered based on a complaint alleged by the complainant alleging offence punishable underSection 138ofNegotiable Instruments Act. Complainant absent. No representation. Steps not taken several opportunities given. Hence, complaint is dismissed under Section 256(1) of the Cr.P.C.”

2. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant/complainant as well as the learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the second respondent. Even though notice was served upon the first respondent, who is the accused in this case, he did not appear.

3. On reading the verdict passed by the trial court, the accused was acquitted under Section 256 (1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure , due to the complainant's failure to appear and to take steps. Even though the non- representation and failure to take steps to proceed with the complaint are the reasons stated for the acquittal of the accused, the learned counsel for the appellant/complainant prayed for one more opportunity

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top