IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
A. Badharudeen, J
Shemitha – Appellant
Versus
Abdul Naseer – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Dated, this the 02nd day of February, 2026 This appeal has been filed challenging the order dated 01.11.2019 in S.T. No. 1294 of 2019 of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Chalakudy, as extracted hereunder:-
“This case is registered based on a complaint alleged by the complainant alleging offence punishable underSection 138ofNegotiable Instruments Act. Complainant absent. No representation. Steps not taken several opportunities given. Hence, complaint is dismissed under Section 256(1) of the Cr.P.C.”
2. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant/complainant as well as the learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the second respondent. Even though notice was served upon the first respondent, who is the accused in this case, he did not appear.
3. On reading the verdict passed by the trial court, the accused was acquitted under Section 256 (1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure , due to the complainant's failure to appear and to take steps. Even though the non- representation and failure to take steps to proceed with the complaint are the reasons stated for the acquittal of the accused, the learned counsel for the appellant/complainant prayed for one more opportunity
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.