Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN, M.B. SNEHALATHA, JJ
DEVAKI – Appellant
Versus
SUPRABHA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. nature of the appeal; contentions presented by both parties. (Para 1 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. petitioner entrusted gold ornaments, alleged misappropriation by in-laws. (Para 4 , 10) |
| 3. court's final orders and reasoning related to the case. (Para 9 , 14) |
JUDGMENT
M.B.Snehalatha, J This appeal has been filed by the appellants/respondents challenging the judgment and decree in O.P.No.743/2013 of Family Court, Irinjalakuda.
2. The parties shall be referred to by their rank in the Original Petition.
3. The wife filed the Original petition contending as follows:
The marriage of the petitioner with Girish Kumar, who is the son of respondents 1 and 2, was solemnised on 16.1.2004 in accordance with the Hindu religious rites. At the time of marriage, petitioner was given 25 sovereigns of gold ornaments by her parents. After the marriage while she was residing in the matrimonial home, she entrusted her 23 sovereigns of st gold ornaments with the 1 respondent, as insisted by respondents 1 and 2. After 15 days of the marriage, the husband of the petitioner went abroad for job. In 2006, he left his job abroad and came back. In 2007, petitioner's husband Girish Kumar died in a motor vehicle
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
