Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN, M.B. SNEHALATHA, JJ
SHOWKATHALI – Appellant
Versus
SHAJILA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeal challenging family court judgment (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. claim for gold ornaments and maintenance (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. arguments against family court’s decree (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. court's consideration of evidence (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. final verdict on the appeal (Para 17 , 18 , 20) |
JUDGMENT
M.B.Snehalatha, J This appeal has been filed by the appellant/husband challenging the judgment and decree in O.P.No.588/2018 of Family Court, Ottapalam.
2. The parties shall be referred to by their rank in the Original Petition.
3. Petition was filed by the wife and children of the respondent contending as follows:
The marriage between the 1st petitioner and the respondent was solemnized on 26.2.2006 as per Islamic rites. Petitioners 2 to 4 are the minor children born in the said wedlock. At the time of marriage, 1st petitioner was given 50 sovereigns of gold ornaments. After fixing the marriage, petitioner's father had entrusted an amount of ₹2,50,000/- to the respondent and his father. After the marriage, while the 1st petitioner was residing at the matrimonial home as insisted by the mother and sister of the respondent, 1st petitioner entrusted all her gold orna
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
