SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 8508

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
NANGANI PRINCEN DEVESSY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
BAIL APPL. NO. 598 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.E.VIJIN KARTHIK, SMT.POOJA P., SMT.ANUJAMOL V. S.
For the Respondents: SMT.SREEJA V., SR. PP

The court can grant transit bail to prevent inter-state arrest, emphasizing personal liberty under specified conditions.

Headnote:This judgment addresses an application for bail filed under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023, wherein the applicant fears arrest due to an ongoing inquiry based on a complaint. The court recognizes the merit of the applicant's apprehension concerning inter-state arrest and allows transit bail while directing the applicant to seek remedies in the jurisdictional court. The ruling reiterates the court's authority to issue transit bail in specific circumstances, validating the applicant's concerns, with the final decision reserving the applicant's right to seek further legal recourse.

Table of Content
1. application for bail under bnss, 2023 owing to potential arrest. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. initial court proceedings and counsel presented. (Para 4)
3. court's remarks on the authority for transit bail. (Para 5 , 6)
4. applicant's rights to seek legal recourse validated. (Para 7)

ORDER

This is an application filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita ( BNSS ), 2023.

2. The respondent No.3 issued Annexure A2 notice to the applicant directing the applicant to appear before him for preliminary enquiry in connection with a complaint filed by one Sri. Gajera Kalpesh Maganbhai, proprietor of J.K. Star Jewels which has been registered as C.A. Application No.905/2025.

3. The applicant apprehends arrest by respondent No.3 in the above proceedings.

4. Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and the learned Public Prosecutor.

5. The Supreme Court in Priya Indoria v. State of Karnataka (2023 KHC OnLine 6997) held that though this Court is not in a position to grant pre-arrest bail in cases where crimes have been registered outside the territorial jurisdiction, this Court is empowered to pass an order of transit bail.

6. The apprehension of the applicant of an inter-state arrest appears to be well-founded. The grounds raised by the applicant for an order of transit bail appears to be reasonable to avoid minimum threat to his life and personal liberty in the jurisdiction where the FIR is registered.

7. The applicant has satisfied this Court regarding his inability to seek anticipatory bail from the court which has territorial jurisdiction to take cognizance of the offence immediately.

This bail application is therefore disposed of with liberty to the applicant to approach the jurisdictional Court and seek proper remedies in accordance with law, within a period of three weeks from today. The respondent No.3 shall not arrest the applicant till the expiry of the said three weeks.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top