O R D E R Dated this the 10^th day of February, 2026 The petitioner in WP(C).No.16859 of 2019 field this review petition praying for reviewing the order dated 3.11.2025 passed by this Court.

2. The prosecution case is that the accused after forging the signature of the defacto complainant, obtained duplicate ATM card from the Federal Bank, Angamali Branch and operated the bank account of the petitioner.

3. From the case diary produced by the learned Public Prosecutor, it was revealed that the Assistant Manager, Federal Bank, Angamali South Branch had given a statement to the effect that there is no difference in the signature of the defacto complainant given in the Account Opening Form and also in the application given for duplicate ATM card. It was also stated by the investigating officer that at present the complainant and the petitioner are abroad and for further investigation, their presence is required and also that it was in the above context, for the time being, a report was given as 'undetected'.

4. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner will come down to India in April 2026. She also contended that the statement given by the Assistant Manager of Fe