Based on the provided legal document, the key points are as follows: The High Court of Kerala addressed a Criminal Miscellaneous Case (Crl.M.C. No. 3660 of 2020) involving the petitioner, Tony George, and the State of Kerala (!) . The petitioner, represented by counsel, sought permission to withdraw the case, with the intention of retaining the right to raise all relevant contentions before the trial court (!) . The court granted permission for the withdrawal of the case, effectively closing the proceedings as withdrawn, and allowed the petitioner to pursue their contentions in the trial court at a later stage if desired (!) (!) . The order was issued by G. Girish, J, on February 10, 2026, and the proceedings were formally closed following the court’s permission (!) . Please let me know if you need further analysis or specific legal advice related to this document.

TONY GEORGE vs STATE OF KERALA - 2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 8554

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 8554

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
G. GIRISH, J
TONY GEORGE – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.RAJAGOPAL PADIPPURACKAL
For the Respondents: SRI.T.N.MANOJ, SRI.SUDHEER G.(PP)

Judgement Key Points

Based on the provided legal document, the key points are as follows:

The High Court of Kerala addressed a Criminal Miscellaneous Case (Crl.M.C. No. 3660 of 2020) involving the petitioner, Tony George, and the State of Kerala (!) .
The petitioner, represented by counsel, sought permission to withdraw the case, with the intention of retaining the right to raise all relevant contentions before the trial court (!) .
The court granted permission for the withdrawal of the case, effectively closing the proceedings as withdrawn, and allowed the petitioner to pursue their contentions in the trial court at a later stage if desired (!) (!) .
The order was issued by G. Girish, J, on February 10, 2026, and the proceedings were formally closed following the court’s permission (!) .

Please let me know if you need further analysis or specific legal advice related to this document.

ORDER

The learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the Crl.M.C., leaving open the option to raise all contentions before the Trial Court.

Permission granted.

Crl.M.C. is closed as withdrawn.

sd/

Click Here to Read the rest of this document