IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
N. NAGARESH, J
P.M.HARIKRISHNAN – Appellant
Versus
DIRECTOR GENERAL CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE – Respondent
J U D G M E N T
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Petitioner, who was compulsorily retired from service while working as Constable in the Central Reserve Police Force, seeks to quash Ext.P11 and to direct respondents 3 and 4 to issue revised PPO with effect from 01.01.1996, 01.01.2006 and 01.01.2016 within a time frame.
2. The petitioner states that he joined service on 23.11.1968 and was compulsorily retired on 27.09.1991. He had a total service of 22 years 1 month and 9 days. The petitioner is drawing his pension. The Pay and Account Officer, CRPF issued Ext.P4 OM dated 14.06.2022 under which the difference between superannuation pension and compulsory retirement pension was removed, thereby entitling all pensioners to get 50% of the last pay drawn. The petitioner submitted a representation dated 30.10.2022 for revising his pension. The representation was forwarded to the 2nd respondent.
3. The 2nd respondent issued Ext.P6 pension revision fixation order. However, the petitioner did not receive revised pension. The petitioner therefore submitted Ext.P7 representation. Thereafter, Ext.P8 reminder was sent. The petitioner filed W.P.(C) No.29476/2023. This Court directed the competent among the resp
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.