Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
N. NAGARESH, J
SAJITHA S – Appellant
Versus
THE KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to retrospective rules. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. legality and authority regarding recruitment. (Para 5 , 11) |
| 3. government's decision on recruitment protocols. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. court's judicial considerations. (Para 10) |
| 5. court's final ruling. (Para 13 , 14) |
J U D G M E N T
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
The petitioner belongs to SIUC Nadar Community and is unemployed. The Kerala PSC, by Ext.P1 Notification dated 30.04.2022, invited applications from SIUC Nadar reservation community for appointment as Clerk / Cashier in the Ernakulam District Co-operative Bank. A written examination was conducted on 23.04.2024. The petitioner participated in the written examination.
2. The grievance of the petitioner is that no steps were taken thereafter to publish the rank list and to advice candidates for appointment. The 1st respondent has taken a stand that since the Bank has amalgamated with the 2nd respondent-Kerala Bank, there is no need to proceed with the selection.
3. The petitioner states that after the amalgamation of District Co-operative Banks and formation of Kerala Bank, the Government approved Recruitment Rules for Kerala Bank as per Ext.P8 G.O. dated 24.03.2023. As p
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
