Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MR. ANIL K.NARENDRAN, MURALEE KRISHNA S., JJ
JAYAKUMAR T.R. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to tribunal's order based on fundamental rights and promotion processes. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. tribunal's failure to consider specific requests in the dismissal. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. criteria for high court's intervention under article 227 explained. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. upholding of tribunal's authority and dismissal of the original petition. (Para 14) |
JUDGMENT
Muralee Krishna, J.
The applicant in O.A.(EKM) No.1302 of 2025 on the file of the Kerala Administrative Tribunal, Additional Bench at Ernakulam (the ‘Tribunal’ for short) filed this original petition, invoking the supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging Ext.P3 order dated 18.09.2025 passed by the Tribunal in that original application.
2. The petitioner filed O.A.(EKM) No.1302 of 2025 before the Tribunal under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 , seeking the following reliefs:
“(i) to issue an order or direction, directing the 1st respondent to stall all the further proceedings on Annexure- A14 File No.L3/152/2024/H.Edn. of the 1st respondent forthwith;
(ii) to issue an order or direction, directing the responde
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
