SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 8617

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MR. BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
ALL KERALA HOUSE BOAT OWNERS ASSOCIATION – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA DEPARTMENT OF PORT – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.DENIZEN KOMATH, SRI.RENJITH THAMPAN (SR.)
For the Respondents: GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SHRI.K.P.SUDHEER, SC, KERALA MARITIME BOARD, SHRI.B.PRAMOD, SHRI.N.MANOJ KUMAR, STATE ATTORNEY, SHRI.K.R.RANJITH, GOVERNMENT PLEADER WITH STATE ATTORNEY, SHRI.ATHUL M.V.

Table of Content
1. writ petition's infructuous status acknowledged. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the respondents submits that the writ petition has become infructuous.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that, though the writ petition has become infructuous, considering the nature of reliefs sought for, there are subsequent orders which may give rise to a challenge or at least an amendment of the writ petition.

3. Since the subsequent orders can give rise to a fresh cause of action, no liberty is required to be reserved.

This writ petition has therefore become infructuous, as conceded by both parties, and hence it is dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top