SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 8787

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
K. BABU, J
SHAHINA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(CRL.) NO. 1328 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.P.V.DILEEP
For the Respondents: E C BINEESH PP

The court emphasizes the necessity of timely investigation and report submission in criminal procedures for ensuring justice.

Headnote:The Writ Petition under Article 226 sought direction for supervision of investigation and completion of proceedings in a specific case at Enathu Police Station. The Court acknowledged ongoing investigations requiring a report from the Forensic Science Laboratory and directed expediting the matter. The investigation will proceed as indicated by the learned Public Prosecutor, affirming the Court's proactive role in ensuring timely conclusion.

Table of Content
1. court directs the investigation to be expedited and acknowledges the importance of the forensic examination. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)

K.BABU, J.

-------------------------------------------

W.P(Crl) NO.1328 OF 2025 -------------------------------------------

Dated this the 5th day of February 2026 J U D G M E N T The prayers in this Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India are as follows:-

“I. Issue a writ mandamus directing the 3rd respondent to supervise the investigation with respect to (Exhibt-P1) Crime No. 1086/2025 of Enathu Police Station, Pathanamthitta District for an impartial investigation.

ii. Issue a writ of mandamus directing the 4th respondent investigating officer to complete the investigation in Exhibt-P1 Crime No. 1086/2025 in Enathu Police Station, Pathanamthitta District and produce its final report before the court below as early as possible for a fair verdict in Exhibt-P2 connected case against petitioner.”

2.The learned Public Prosecutor, on instructions, submitted that the investigation is in progress and would be completed only after receipt of the report from the Forensic Science Laboratory (FSL).

3.In view of the above, the 4th respondent is directed to expedite the investigation.

4.The Director of the Forensic Science Laboratory (FSL) will take necessary steps to complete the examination of the disputed cheque at the earliest.

With the aforesaid submissions, the writ petition is closed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top