Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MRS. SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN, J
ANNAM @ ANNAMKUTTY – Appellant
Versus
THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the petition and associated parties. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court observations on statutory remedies and appeal rights. (Para 3) |
| 3. final ruling directing the petitioner to file an appeal. (Para 4) |
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed by the petitioner, seeking a direction to quash Ext.P3 order passed by the 1st respondent under the Maintenance and Welfare of the Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007.
2. The petitioner is a senior citizen aged 85 years, who approached the 1st respondent seeking cancellation of Release Deed No.2857/2021 of Angamaly SRO executed in favour of her son, late Chacko, who died intestate. The 2nd respondent is the daughter-in-law of the petitioner and respondents 3 and 4 are the children of the 2nd respondent. The petitioner has no other property in her name. After the death of her son, the respondents started subjecting her to cruelty and therefore, she approached the 1st respondent by filing Ext.P1 petition. Thereafter, the 1st respondent passed Ext.P3 order rejecting the prayer of the petitioner for cancellation of the release deed. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner has approached this Court with the above writ petition.
3. I have
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
