Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
SAINABA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of the allegations against the applicant in the case. (Para 2) |
| 2. arguments presented by the applicant's counsel regarding innocence and by the prosecutor regarding necessity of bail denial. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's observational reasoning about unavailability of bail due to the gravity of the offense and potential witness tampering. (Para 7 , 8) |
ORDER
This application is filed underSection 482of theBharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, BNSS ), seeking pre- arrest bail.
2. The applicant is the accused No.2 in Crime No.972/2025 of Kondotty Police Station, Malappuram District. The offences alleged are punishable under Sections 336 (2), 336(3), 337, 340(2) read with Section 3 (5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita , 2023.
3. The prosecution case, in short, is that between 04.04.2025 and 07.08.2025, the applicant along with other accused in furtherance of their common intention to commit the offence, forged the signature and seal of the Village Officer of Morayur Village Office, where the defacto complainant is working as the Special Village Officer, made fake possession certificates on 06.08.2025 and 30.06.2025 and forged the fake tax receipt on 04.04
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
