Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K.NARENDRAN, MURALEE KRISHNA S., JJ
ABHIJITH M.K – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of the case and background information. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. no grounds found for overturning the tribunal's dismissal based on procedural compliance. (Para 3 , 4 , 12) |
| 3. petitioners argue that vacancies should be filled based on prior judgments and regulations despite their probation completion status. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. high court's limited supervisory powers under article 227 to maintain judicial integrity. (Para 7 , 13) |
| 5. conclusion of the case with the dismissal of the original petition. (Para 17) |
JUDGMENT
Muralee Krishna, J.
The applicants 1, 2 and 4 in O.A.No.782 of 2021 on the file of the Kerala Administrative Tribunal, Thiruvananthapuram (the ‘Tribunal’ for short), filed this original petition invoking the supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India , challenging Ext.P7 order dated 04.12.2025 passed by the Tribunal in that original application. For convenience of reference, the parties are referred to in this judgment in their status as they were before the Tribunal, unless otherwise stated.
2. Going by the pleadings in the original application, the applicants are presently working as Demonstrator/instructor Grade
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
