SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 8918

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
M.K. KABEER – Appellant
Versus
THE MARADU MUNICIPALITY – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.JOBY JACOB PULICKEKUDY, SRI.ANIL GEORGE, SHRI.DAJISH JOHN, SMT.SMITHA PHILIPOSE, SHRI.ASHIK TOM, SHRI.AAKHIL MOHAMMED.P.M
For the Respondents: SHRI.T.R.RAJAN SC, MARADU MUNICIPALITY

JUDGMENT

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter is not pressed.

Accordingly the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top