SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 9014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
ROBINS RAJAN – Appellant
Versus
ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, IDUKKI – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.JOSEPH KIRAN D. THEKKEKARA, SRI.ARUN JOSE THOMAS, SHRI.DAVIS PIUS, SHRI.SHINTO SABASTIAN, SHRI.JEO GEORGE, SMT.RESHMA R.NAIR, SMT.CHINNU ROSE MARY THOMAS
For the Respondents: SRI. P.S. APPU

J U D G M E N T

The writ petition is filed seeking a direction to the 1st respondent to pass orders on the application preferred by the petitioner under the provisions of the Arms Act and Rules. It is seen that though a notice was issued on 28.08.2024 by the 1st respondent, no orders have been passed, so far, on the application.

Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of, directing the

1st respondent to consider and pass orders, in accordance with law, on the application submitted by the petitioner for an Arms licence at the earliest, at any rate within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

Sd/-

MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., JUDGE JJ APPENDIX OF WP(C) NO. 42385 OF 2025 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 1 ST RESPONDENT DATED 28-08-2024 RESPONDENT ANNEXURES Annexure R2(a) True copy of notification dated 18-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top