JUDGMENT

This writ petition is filed challenging Ext.P25 order issued by the

2^nd respondent. When the said order was challenged before this Court through this writ petition, initially an interim order was issued on 15.01.2026, staying the appointment of the 6^th respondent as a temporary Manager. This Court also directed the DEO, Mavelikkara to act as the Manager of the school in question. However, after the 6^th respondent entered appearance and filed a counter affidavit, a modification was made to the aforementioned interim order. As per the order dated 22.01.2026, the 6^th respondent was found to be continuing as a Manager from 15.11.2024, subject to the outcome of the proceedings before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal and hence the DEO, who was directed by the earlier order dated 15.01.2024, to take charge, was directed to handover the charge to the 6^th respondent. An observation was however made, that the 6^th respondent, shall not make any permanent appointment to the post of Teacher in the meantime.

2. Both learned Senior Counsel, appearing for the petitioner and for the 6^th respondent, now concedes that Ext.P28 revision petition is pending before the first respondent