IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
GOUTHAM V – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed with following prayers:
i. Quash Exhibit-P3 issuing a writ in the nature of certiorari;
ii. Quash the condition in Exhibit-P1 which provides for collection of fee at the rate of Rs. 100/- per square feet for the area exceeding 3000 square feet when the landowner wants to make constructions the plot;
iii. Issue any appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring that the petitioner is not liable to make any payment as provided under Rule 12 (9) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land & Wet Land Rules, 2018;
iv. Declare that the Respondents 4 and 5 are bound to issue building permit to the Petitioner without making payment of the money demanded by Exhibit-P3;
v. Issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring that the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land & Wet Land Rules, 2018 framed under Rule 12 (9) is ultra-virus the provisions of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land & Wet Land Act, 2008 to the extent it imposes levy of fee of @ Rs. 100/- for one square foot;
vi. Issue any appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring that the petitioner is not liable to pay Rs. 100/- per sq.ft. as provided under the Kerala Co
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.